UX Collective

We believe designers are thinkers as much as they are makers. https://linktr.ee/uxc

Follow publication

Member-only story

Beyond the Double Diamond: thinking about a better design process model

Source: https://www.designcouncil.org.uk/news-opinion/design-process-what-double-diamond

Double Diamond is the name of a design process model developed by the British Design Council in 2005. Divided into four phases — Discover, Define, Develop and Deliver — it is probably the best known and the most popular design process visualization.

The main feature of the Double Diamond is its emphasis on the “divergent” and “convergent thinking”, where first many ideas are created, before refining and narrowing down to the best idea. This is happening twice in this model—once to confirm the problem definition and once to create the solution.

While this is all fine, I have always had some problems with the Double Diamond. Namely:

  • It’s completely separating the analysis/discovery and the definition of the problem from the ideation and the delivery of the solution(s). It’s very linear and this is not how great designers really work. Designers are starting with some solution in mind, and there is nothing wrong with that, if they are not too attached to their first ideas. Most design problems are “wicked problems” — such problems are not understood properly until after the formulation of a solution. The vision of the solution stimulates the research and framing of the problem, which is informing and shaping the vision of the solution, and so on.

Create an account to read the full story.

The author made this story available to Medium members only.
If you’re new to Medium, create a new account to read this story on us.

Or, continue in mobile web

Already have an account? Sign in

Written by Maciej Lipiec

Digital Product Designer. Former Product Design Director at K2 Internet & Head of UX/UI at Empik Group.

Responses (32)

Write a response

I understand the desire to get away from a reworked waterfall process, but one weakness I see is the Brief coming in at the very beginning of the process.
Your definition is “the initial design problem or vision of the outcome” — sounds good, but a…

--

I like your idea very much (and the simplicity of it)! The only concern for me is that there is no emphasis on user testing… I understand it takes place somewhere during delivery, but I feel it’s too important to be left out. What are your thoughts?

--

While I agree the process is often non-linear, this is a model of the activities — not a description of the order in which they always happen. In other words, there’s nothing stopping you from starting with a solution and then returning to the…

--