Member-only story
Friction as a fix
Adding a little friction to experiences can help users slow down in those moments they may need to
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7ca67/7ca677c519a36a253bb628a8d50b162c156fc7ae" alt="Angry man with slicked back dark hair, his face contorted with rage, holds his mobile phone with both hands. He wears a brown suit with a red tie."
As designers, we often focus on removing as much friction as possible from experiences. That’s sensible. We want to avoid placing any hurdles before users as they pursue their goals online, whether that be, for example, buying a plane ticket, signing up for a streaming service, or subscribing to a newsletter.
Nonetheless, we’ve learned there are moments when it would prove helpful for users to slow down instead. No surprise, many of these moments arise on social media platforms.
One of the most famous examples of a moments when friction was removed from an experience to deleterious effect was when Twitter debuted the “retweet” feature in 2009. You may remember that before that, users would copy and paste a tweet into their own window, typing the letters “RT” in front of it to signify they were quoting someone else. Seems archaic now, huh? Famously, the developer who created the retweet function regrets it. In 2019, Chris Wetherell told BuzzFeed News, “We might have just handed a 4-year-old a loaded weapon.” Twitter’s former head of product Jason Goldman agreed. “The biggest problem is the quote retweet,” he said. “Quote retweet allows for the dunk. It’s the dunk mechanism.”