UX Collective

We believe designers are thinkers as much as they are makers. https://linktr.ee/uxc

Follow publication

How X’s (formerly Twitter) mistake taught me two important UX principles

An Image of phone with Twitter running on it.
Photo by Sara Kurfeß on Unsplash

Late last year Twitter released an update for their mobile application. It was a change in user flow for retweeting and quoting a tweet. Now I know many of you might not know how Twitter works but don’t worry, I will explain it to you. If you are familiar you can skip the next part.

Article for the news about the update: https://slate.com/technology/2020/10/twitter-retweet-change-election.html

How Twitter works

To start, with you need to know these 3 things:

Tweet: When you post a thought, an idea, or a simple statement about anything or everything it is called a tweet.

Retweet: When you agree with a tweet made by someone else and want to share it with the people that follow you, you can retweet it, it's just like echoing a statement.

Quote Tweet: Now when you see a tweet and you think you have something to add to the conversation(let it be in agreement or disagreement) but also at the same time want to hear opinions from your followers as well, you can quote the tweet.

An example of all three types Tweet, Retweet and Quoted Tweet
Example of a tweet, retweet, and quoted tweet.

Change in user flow

This is the old user flow in which, once the user clicks the icon to retweet, the user was presented with an overlay screen with the option to quote it or to retweet it.

A picture explaining old user flow, In which one could decide to retweet/Quote a Tweet and was presented with an Overlay screen to choose between the two and then go on to do as per clicked by the user.
Old user flow (before the update)

This is the new user flow in which, once the user clicks the icon to retweet, the user is taken to the quoting screen. Now if the user adds any comment, it would be a quoted tweet, and if he tweets it blank it would be a retweet.

An Image explaining New user flow after the update. In this user first clicks on the retweet Icon will be taken to Quoting Screen and If user types any text and tweet it, it would represent a quoted tweet and if it was left blank it would be considered as Retweet.
New user flow (after update)

Intention/Reason for change

Just an FYI here, I am not a Twitter employee, so I could only assume and predict with the knowledge I have about UX

The intention, I believe, the change was made was to reduce the number of clicks a user makes while retweeting and quoting tweets and the time it takes to do so.

The other reason, I believe is, they targeted the user base that was already familiar with quoting and retweeting and betted on them to understand the change and use it, as it would make things easier for them.

But… users hated it

The moment it was launched everyone started tweeting about how they hate the new way to retweet things. The users were confused, they quoted tweets which they wanted to retweet.

It was so confusing for some that they even started to avoid retweeting things, even Twitter’s official account kind of acknowledged it.

An image that is full of tweets from users who hated the new way to Retweet.
Picture of tweets of users who hated the new way to retweet.

Here is a link to see all the hundreds of thousands of tweets about how much users hate the new method — Twitter Search

What went wrong and why

When I first saw the hate ( if I am being honest even I hated it) I really wondered why are users hating the update. So I did some digging and after a while, I remembered these 2 UX Principles that I had read in books and articles. The first being …

1. Krug’s second law of usability

In his book Don’t Make Me Think, author Steve Krug explains the second law of usability which is:

“It doesn’t matter how many times users have to click, as long as each click is a mindless, unambiguous choice.”

That means users don’t mind clicking on the retweet and quote tweet button on the overlay screen of the old user flow as long as it isn't confusing them.

An image of overlay that used to be in the old user flow, which also presents the option to Quote or Retweet a tweet.
Overlay Screen

2. Jakob Nielsen’s concept of Mental Model

Now I was aware of the concept of the mental model but I didn’t relate the Twitter situation with it directly, but after some research and going through Jakob Nielsen’s Article in NNgroup , I saw the relation.

“A mental model is a model of what users know or they think they know about a system.”

After using Twitter for years or months most users have the way retweet works entrenched into their brains and they have created their own mental model on how it should work, but when Twitter changes it, their mental model is challenged which results in bad User Experience.

What happened next

Well, we all make mistakes and have seen failure even after having good intentions in our minds. But we need to learn from it to survive, to be at the top, and to stay there, which Twitter has been for a while.

They changed it back to the previous model.

A Tweet that shows, how a Twitter user is happy about the old way of retweeting is back which is liked by 367k other users.

They say examples help you learn things faster and well I have come to believe it as I am never forgetting these 2 UX principles.

I hope this was worth your time and helped you learn something.

The UX Collective donates US$1 for each article we publish. This story contributed to World-Class Designer School: a college-level, tuition-free design school focused on preparing young and talented African designers for the local and international digital product market. Build the design community you believe in.

Written by Pranjal Singh

Product designer at Swiggy (prev-MakeMyTrip, Scaler)

Responses (1)

Write a response

Twitter changed their retweeting during the contentious US presidenial election season of 2020. I honestly thought they slowed things down on purpose, to make it harder to blindly retweet possible misinformation. I hated the new format, and was…

--