UX Collective

We believe designers are thinkers as much as they are makers. https://linktr.ee/uxc

Follow publication

Member-only story

Is AI killing human passion?

Slava Polonski, PhD
UX Collective
Published in
9 min readJun 6, 2024

Three-panel comic strip in a 16:9 horizontal format, focused on a young Caucasian girl in a world where AI has automated most jobs. In the first panel, the girl is in a sprawling futuristic cityscape filled with robots and drones performing various tasks, with her looking on skeptically and thinking, “Do I even need to do anything?”. She is at home, sitting comfortably in an automated living room with robots doing chores, while she idly plays with a gadget, her expression one of boredom.
Longing for meaningful work in the world of AI (Source: Illustration by author via DALL-E)

Passion paradox in the age of AI

In an era where AI can paint like Picasso and write like Hemingway, the line between human genius and silicon savvy blurs. We were once advised to chase our dreams and turn our passions into paychecks. But what happens when the canvas of our dreams becomes a playground for algorithms that can churn out masterpieces in milliseconds? When AI surpasses human abilities in every aspect? And when our creative efforts seem redundant in the face of machine-generated perfection?

Consider the world of UX design: tools like Uizard and Galileo can now generate sophisticated UI mockups with minimal input, doing everything a junior interaction designer can do and more. Visual designers, too, face similar challenges with platforms like Leonardo, Midjourney, and Adobe Firefly, which can now render both hands and text flawlessly — tasks that just a few months ago were thought to be beyond the reach of AI. Thus, what becomes of the illustrator when illustrations become a commodity, infinitely available at the whim of code?

This shift challenges the very essence of human creativity and raises profound questions about our place in a world where AI is just better at everything. How do we find meaning and purpose when the unique skills that once defined us are effortlessly outperformed by the latest LLMs?

“In a future like that, what would people do with their time? Would anyone still want to get an education when an agent has all the answers?” — Bill Gates

The erosion of skill and passion

My friend Jon Jachimowicz, now an assistant professor at Harvard Business School, has extensively studied human passion in the workplace. His research illuminates why pursuing one’s passion can often be so challenging.

Jon finds that although 90% of graduates consider “pursuing their passion” an important goal for their future careers, only 20% of full-time workers in the US report being genuinely passionate about their jobs…

Create an account to read the full story.

The author made this story available to Medium members only.
If you’re new to Medium, create a new account to read this story on us.

Or, continue in mobile web

Already have an account? Sign in

Written by Slava Polonski, PhD

UX Research Lead @ Google Flights | 20% People+AI Guidebook | Forbes 30 Under 30 | PhD | Global Shaper & Expert @WEF | Prevsly @UniofOxford @Harvard

Write a response

I can appreciate this approach to redirecting energy into a passion. And kudos for creating new GPTs – looking forward to trying them out.
I do agree that the centaur model or true symbiotic relationship probably has more potential than people…

--

Great article. About a quarter way through I was thinking “so the way to do this to move the passion process to AI, right?” 😇

And thanks for explaining how passion develops rather that just “is”. I’ve been grappling a lot with that too. Love your work. 🙌🏻

--

I would rather say, it will remind us how average most of us are and will push us harder to differentiate (with or without AI)...

--