Member-only story
So… did Netflix win?
In the case of the Netflix password crackdown, did ease of use win over user outrage?

In February, I wrote about the upset caused by Netflix’s announcement that they would be cracking down on password sharing, a practice that was previously encouraged. I thought that it was short-sighted by Netflix to presume that all users on a single account we’re part of a single, fixed location household. This idea ignored a significant portion of users: people who travel for business, children off at college, vacation houses, and the average family that doesn’t all live under the same roof.

Given the irate tweets, and the heap of comments saying that they would be forgoing their Netflix subscriptions because of this decision, Netflix must have lost a lot of subscribers upon officially implementing this rule, right?
Wrong.
Netflix enjoyed an influx subscribers. There was an anticipated spate of cancellations, but according to Variety, “the ratio of sign-ups to cancelations since May 23 increased 25.6% compared with the previous 60-day period.” It turned out that the people faced with this screen really wanted to watch whatever they were trying to watch, even if that meant paying for a new subscription.
What happened to all the outrage? What happened to the people swearing that they would resort to piracy over paying for another subscription?
Here’s the thing about piracy: the Internet has made it largely easier to execute, but it’s still not as easy as just hitting a prompt to subscribe to Netflix. Given the choice, most people will take the path of least resistance and opt in to something that they might even be against “on principle” if it means easy access.