UX Collective

We believe designers are thinkers as much as they are makers. https://linktr.ee/uxc

Follow publication

Member-only story

The dangers of ‘Engagement’ as an untethered KPI

Melinda Jacobs
UX Collective
Published in
6 min readAug 26, 2022

A person’s arm is outstretched and is holding a compass in front of a scenic view of sand, mountains, and shrubbery in the backgound.
Photo by Heidi Fin on Unsplash

I hear one word more than any others in my day-to-day gamification work: engagement. It usually pops up when I ask the question:

“So, why are you interested in using gamification in your product?”

Almost always comes the response:

“We need more engagement.”

But it’s my next question that causes people to struggle to put words together.

“Why?”

So many sources out there, talks, articles, interviews, podcast, emphasize how important it is to capture attention and control engagement in such a way that everyone seems to always be looking for more, more, more without asking themselves why or what engagement really means to them — or to their product or service.

Let’s take a journey into what engagement really is, the role it should (and shouldn’t) play in our design journey, and reflect a little on why we are so focused on getting quantity over quality.

Demystifying Engagement

In the design world, we tend to define engagement in relation to the amount of involvement, interactions, and focus users have with our product. Engagement happens when we…

Create an account to read the full story.

The author made this story available to Medium members only.
If you’re new to Medium, create a new account to read this story on us.

Or, continue in mobile web

Already have an account? Sign in

Written by Melinda Jacobs

Geek interested in organization psychology, gamification, & the impact of technology. CPO @ Mindstone & Gamification Expert @ Subatomic 🏳️‍🌈

Write a response